Entries Tagged as ''

David Zahniser Leaves the LAWeekly

Yes I know, the LAWeekly has a kind of avant-garde quality to it but over the last year it was seriously taking up the empty void created by the Los Angeles Times when the latter began its trek towards urban irrelevance. 

David Zahniser – the Z-man of the Z-files, began steering the LAWeekly in a direction that replicated some serious journalism that hasn’t been seen in decades.  he wrote topics few main stream media (MSM) reporters or their bureaus would touch. Some of those were:

  • That’s Not Permitted – José Huizar ignored the law, expanded his house, then used insiders to make things okay;
  • Powered by Payments – ACORN bills itself as grassroots, but it’s on the mayor’s payroll;
  • School Board Money Frenzy – Massive cash gushing into campaigns backed by Villaraigosa could outdo the $2.3 million raised by Riordan;
  • Revolving Door – Doling out dough to current and ex-girlfriends, Alarcón spent a small fortune to win a post he no longer wants;
  • Targeting a Weiss Guy - Westside homeowners are furious with their pro-development city councilman;
  • Urine Luck, L.A. Gangs! – Piddling programs – like teaching kids to install urinals – dominate Antonio’s plan to save the city’s youth;
  • Do As We Say, Not As We Do – Smart growth’s biggest boosters still love suburban living. (A series of articles exposing the limits and failings of LA’s Smart Growth policies)
  • Splitsville: Villaraigosa Spins his Wrecked Marriage – Watch out for whiplash;
  • LAX Expansion Betrayal? - Thinking they’d won, Westsiders eyeball an even more intrusive runway plan;
  • Failing the Smell Test – City claims Westside traffic will ease, thanks to two skyscraper condos;
  • The Final Hours of Miguel Contreras – The 911 call said he went in for a card reading. But the death of the labor leader prompted a prostitution raid. What really went down at the botanica?

David Z, has moved on to the Los Angeles Times. clearly LAWeekly’s loss, and the Times gain but it remains to be seen if he’ll have the same sort of freedom to go after the cities sacred cows and policymakers or whether he’ll be reigned in by the papers editors.

WitnessLA.com writes

“David Zahniser, one of Los Angeles’ best journalists, gave notice Thursday and is headed to the L.A. Times to cover Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa and local politics. For the past 18 months, he’s covered City Hall for the L.A. Weekly and written “The Z Files,” his column taking Antonio and others to task for occasional bouts of duplicity or otherwise putting their own interests ahead of the public.”

What makes David so valuable is his depth, commitment and intense desire to be first with a story–all attributes that describe a good reporter, but to the millionth degree in his case. He chases down leads on weekends, to every part of the city. If someone won’t return a phone call, expect to see David paying a special home visit. He’s jabbering on the phone – constantly, unless he’s in a city meeting, attending a press conference, grabbing coffee with a source, or writing.

This guy is no 9-to-fiver with weekends off. In a typical week, David will make at least 100 telephone calls. His best sources can expect several calls daily. No one works harder for a story tip, nor does anyone enjoy the pursuit of a story more than David, whose engaging, informed tone tames even the most reluctant sources. His insights and productivity earned him recognition as the best city hall reporter in a Los Angeles Magazine profile by RJ Smith last November.

If you can’t beat them, hire em. Hopefully this hire is a turnaround for the Los Angeles Times and not one of those acquisitions meant to continually stifle our faith in the media.

Rosendahl Moves Forward With New LAX Safety Study

New runway option is also put on the table. 

ROSENDAHL MOVES FORWARD WITH NEW LAX SAFETY STUDY

New Runway Study Wins Unanimous Support from Los Angeles City Council

LOS ANGELES- Los Angeles City Councilmember Bill Rosendahl has won unanimous support from the Los Angeles City Council to move forward with a new airport study that will consider safety on the LAX North Airfield and identify alternatives to moving runways north into the communities of Westchester and Playa del Rey.

The Los Angeles City Council voted 11-0 to approve Rosendahl’s motion that called for a new airport study to be conducted by an independent firm with community input.

“The community deserves to know if there is truly a safety issue on the northern runways.” Rosendahl said. “If there is a real runway safety issue, I want to deal with it. And, in order to do so, I need an independent study with objective, concrete data. I am pleased that my council colleagues support this motion.”

Rosendahl submitted a council motion calling previous safety studies “highly suspect”, and requesting Los Angeles World Airports (LAWA) to work with a panel of community representatives to select an objective firm to conduct a more comprehensive study that examines alternatives to runway movement.

The study is required to focus only on safety issues, recommend a range of potential solutions to any identified problems, and specifically examine the feasibility of an end-around taxiway system.

Rosendahl has also called for consideration of a “one-runway” option that would eliminate runway incursions by replacing the two existing runways in the north with one, wider, runway capable of seamlessly handling the new large aircraft of the future, like the Airbus A380.

While that would reduce the total number of LAX’s runways to three, Rosendahl notes that London Heathrow Airport handles 69 million annual passengers, more than LAX, on only two runways.

Rosendahl, who submitted his motion on June 6, a day after moderating a Town Hall meeting attended by several hundred Westchester and Playa Del Rey community members, said that he was very pleased to see the swift approval of the motion.

“This new study needs to happen right now.” Rosendahl said. “LAWA has made bogus arguments about the need to move runways into our communities and we need a real study that examines healthy alternatives. I am very happy to see that we are able to get a new study underway and can move forward with disproving the myth that safety issues necessitate north runway movement.”

The motion calls on the Los Angeles Board of Airport Commissioners
(BOAC) to hire an independent firm or organization to conduct a comprehensive, objective study and analysis of north airfield safety issues, and examine the results of the study before releasing formal proposals for LAX modernization.

The motion says that the new safety study should be shaped by a community advisory group – the North Runway Safety Advisory Committee. The committee will include: representatives of the Alliance for a Regional Solution to Airport Congestion (ARSAC); the Neighborhood Council of Westchester- Playa del Rey; Council District 11; Council District 8; Los Angeles County; the City of Inglewood; airport area congressional representatives; the greater Los Angeles business community; and the Airline Airport Affairs Committee.

The committee would review and rank potential firms and organizations to conduct the safety study before BOAC made a final hiring decision, and would also further craft and refine the scope of the safety study, shape the questions posed therein, and comment on findings.

Last month, Los Angeles World Airports (LAWA) released five reports discussing safety and operational efficiency on the LAX North Airfield. Each concluded that the runways be moved at least 340 feet closer to the surrounding community.

Rosendahl condemned the airport-funded studies as “ludicrous, biased and unfounded” and said the studies were conducted by airline industry insiders, and strayed from safety issues to focus more on “operational efficiency”, which many consider to be code for “expansion” into neighboring communities.

Remember the Air China 747 near Catastrophe?

Remember the Air China 747 that looked like is was going to land on Westchester on the evening of November 14th, 2006?  It came within 700′ overhead of Osage, Westport and Kentwood as it appeared to be attempting to switch between the LAX’s South airfield and the North airfield runways and ultimately lining up well over 3,000 ft north of the north runway before it aborted the attempt to land. The aircraft has a 211′ wingspan.

__airchina747.jpgNon-english speaking pilots, tired from trans-Pacific flights, talking to english speaking air controllers might be the problem.

According to a Reuters news article, less than a tenth of China’s pilots meet international aviation English standards, the airline regulator said Tuesday, encouraging them to rise to the challenge of bolstering their linguistic skills.

And some pilots have the wrong attitude and are prevaricating, the China’s civil aviation authority said in a statement on its Web site (www.caac.gov.cn).

Here was the series of messages on the local list server that relived the event:

—– Original Message —–
From: david@westchesterkids.org
To: ONAList; wpdrncNews@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2006 10:18 PM
Subject: [wpdrncNews] RE: [onalist] Airplane flying dangerously low!

The aircraft CCA1059 (Air China Boeing 747-400), looked like it was lined up for the South runway. It then shifted over to the north runway where AAL1307 (American Airlines Boeing 737-800) had landed at 20:08. Probably not enough spacing between them forcing the CCA1059 to abort the landing. At around 20:19/20 the CCA1059 finally landed on the North runway. I don’t know why it did not land on South runway. At least according to there were no other flights landing there in the few minutes previous to its approach. Like others who reported here, it was quite low (700 ft) over our home.

CCA1059 20:09 B744
AAL1307 20:08 B738

David Coffin

—–Original Message—–
From: H Rose
Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2006 8:55 PM
To: ONAList
Subject: Re: [onalist] Airplane flying dangerously low!A 747-400. He flew over Osage Park at about 700 feet around 8:09 PM and over Playa del Rey climbing to about 1400 feet by the time he got to us.

It looks like he didn’t line up on the runway properly and was instructed to
go around.

You can replay the incident here:
http://www4.passur.com/lax.html

H Rose

Playa del Rey, CA

Beezer2468 wrote:

About 10-15 minutes ago, a plane came flying over our house — so low and so loud I could hear the engine screaming as it approached. I have NEVER heard a plane sound that loud flying over our neighborhood — not even when the planes take off to the east.

From the sound of it, I honestly thought it was going to hit something. I went running out to the backyard in time to see the plane change its downward landing plan and begin an ascent back into the sky.

I have seen this in the distance a few times — planes coming in closer to the north runway path and then suddenly ascending again, skipping the landing at the last minute.

Are we having more incursion issues with the south runway closed? And to whom do we complain about this?

This was very rattling.

Maybe the screaming sound came from the plane switching abruptly from landing to ascending mode.

It was the size of a commuter plane, I believe . . .

Christina on Reading

NO MySpace

no_myspace_logo1.jpgThere is nothing good to be said about this so called ”social networking” service called MySpace. 

It’s like inviting a stranger into your home that only your child can see and correspond with.  Love your children by keeping them away from of it.

New Airport Study is Tentatively Approved

Good News. Earlier I mentioned that Rosendahl announced that he filed a motion with in the Los Angeles City Council that requests that the Board of Airport Commissioners (BOAC) conduct a new comprehensive and objective study and analysis of north airfield safety issues that is limited to safety issues, and not consider issues such as operational efficiency or capacity enhancement, which are not genuine safety concerns.

The motion also requested BOAC to form a North Runway Safety Advisory Committee consisting of representatives from the following entities: Council District 11; Council District 8; Los Angeles County; the City of Inglewood; the Alliance for a Regional Solution to Airport Congestion; the Neighborhood Council of Westchester-Playa del Rey; airport area congressional representatives; the greater Los Angeles business community; and the Airline Airport Affairs Committee.

The good news is that the motion is on the ‘consent calendar’ which means that it has been tentatively approved by the City Council. The motion will be formalized Wednesday.

This means that a new study will be conducted on the North Airfield using its current volume of operations (take offs and landings) and not LAWA’s the planned 66% increase.

Finally a little transparency in how this goose is being sold to the public.

The Ultimate Google Map For Dad’s

Where dad’s like to take their kids on a Saturday afternoon. Map it! 

Thanks to Alert the Bear for this priceless guide. 

How Old is Your Street?

kentwood_certificate1.jpgVisit this city web site to view your streets birth certificate with the cities Engineering Automated Street Inventory System or EASIS.

http://navigatela.lacity.org/easis/easis_query.cfm

Examples: Truxton Avenue (1940); Arizona Circle (1958); Kentwood Avenue (1941); Loyola Blvd (1928); Falmouth Avenue (1917); Osage (1917). Dates of the oldest streets seem to default to 12-20-17

Thanks to the Los Angeles City Nerd at www.citynerd.com www.LAcitynerd.com for alerting us to this very cool tool.

OUR FUTURE
If Our Policymakers Have Their Way

Required reading for those of you wondering where our city planners and elected officials are heading, why the traffic is getting worse and why our policymakers want to lead us there.

David Zahniser, formerly of the Daily Breeze and now with the LA Weekly writes a series of articles detailing our numbing future.

What’s smart about Smart Growth? - City Hall’s plan for the future expects you to give up the yard, the car – and learn to love density. Westchester is even mentioned in the article (bottom of pg 7) as the birthplace of LA’s Smart Growth. It’s being built right now at the Furama hotel site (at Lincoln and Manchester) and soon to be given a trendy, yet forgettable name Playa del Oro.

Peddling Smart Growth - Call your project “smart” – even when it isn’t -and get millions in public funds.

Areas of DensityA Denser LA - A map of the Los Angeles City Councils and Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa’s plan to embrace the concept of “smart growth,” a plan to concentrate multistory, “mixed use” housing — stores and restaurants on the ground, apartments or condos above — on or near transit corridors. To carry out City Hall’s vision of a much denser city, the Planning Department developed this map showing every place in L.A. that lies within 1,500 feet of a busy transit stop — places where buses and trains stop every 15 minutes or less during afternoon rush hour.

Do as We Say, Not as We Do - Smart growths movers and shakers still love suburban living. The best and most common theme for why they chose an R-1 life over smart growth; “It’s the place my wife found” (Henry Cisneros), “my wife wouldn’t go for it” (Councilman Ed Reyes). I got to agree with them. Hell hath no fury like a woman asked to give up her R-1.

Second place for the best reason for not switching over to the smart growth lifestyle; “I can afford it” (Stefanos Polyzoides). Third best went to Diego Cardoso who says “his wife rides transit to her downtown job”.  I’m worried about that marriage.

Rosendahl Files Motion for New Safety Study
Sans Capacity Enhancements

Rosendahl Files Motion for New Safety Study Sans Capacity Enhancements

Rosendahl announced that he filed a motion with in the Los Angeles City Council that requests that the Board of Airport Commissioners (BOAC) conduct a new comprehensive and objective study and analysis of north airfield safety issues that is limited to safety issues, and not consider issues such as operational efficiency or capacity enhancement, which are not genuine safety concerns.

Recent LAWA studies were criticized for implying that the current run way configuration was unsafe but in fact the results were obtained under an entirely different scenarios where a large percentage the flights on the south airfield would be moved to the north airfield, a process described as “load balancing and capacity enhancements”.

The motion also requests BOAC to form a North Runway Safety Advisory Committee consisting of representatives from the following entities: Council District 11; Council District 8; Los Angeles County; the City of Inglewood; the Alliance for a Regional Solution to Airport Congestion; the Neighborhood Council of Westchester-Playa del Rey; airport area congressional representatives; the greater Los Angeles business community; and the Airline Airport Affairs Committee.

CONDEMNED
LAWA’s Vision for Westchester and Playa del Rey

Images of Westchester and Playa del Rey’s past haunt tomorrows future if LAWA and ALPA pursue moving the runways north. Pictures of homes that were condemned back in the 70′s resulting in the loss of 4,500 homes and 14,000 residents.


A

All pictures by John Divola 1975-76

b


3f07
 lax6018f06.jpg

5001a aztecE

All pictures by John Divola 1975-76 [Read more →]